Rigged Debates: Wikileaks Emails Confirm Clinton’s Media Rigged Debates & Election

According to one of thousands of recently emails, Clinton’s people asked for all sorts of special treatment from the DNC and the press and THEY GOT IT.

On October 12, WikiLeaks released part four and five of Clinton campaign Chair John Podesta’s emails, with part six and seven also recently released.

From Observer.com:

As soon as the nomination is wrapped up, I will be your biggest surrogate,” current Interim Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Donna Brazile, wrote to Podesta in a January 2016 email. As a Vice Chair of the DNC, Brazile was bound to neutrality per the charter, but as shown in several emails released so far, that was not the case. WIKILEAKS

“I pushed back hard on this, and Axe. So weird to attack the kids the night before the first primary,” Brazile wrote in an email she forwarded to Podesta about what CNN was doing while she served as a CNN contributor. WIKILEAKS

On October 10, an email was released that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton camp to an outreach campaign being conducted by the Sanders campaign. Brazile defended herself on Twitter claiming she also sent the Sanders campaign “advice,” but did not release or cite any examples.

An April 2015 email describes the Clinton campaign and DNC coordinating to rig the debate schedule for Clinton’s benefit. The debate schedule was a commonly cited criticism against then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned after the WikiLeaks release of DNC emails in July showed her overt favoritism for Clinton all through the primaries.

Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina)” read the email from Charlie Baker, a senior advisor to the Clinton campaign from the Dewey Square Group. “The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier.” WIKILEAKS

An email from November 2014 shows Clinton campaign staff backing a law that would push the Illinois primary from March to April or May, with their reasoning being that the state could potentially serve as a lifeline to moderate Republicans as it did for Mitt Romney in 2012.

“The Clintons won’t forget what their friends have done for them. It would be helpful to feel out what path, if any, we have to get them to yes. This will probably take some pushing,” wrote Clinton Campaign Manager Robby Mook to Podesta. WIKILEAKS

The primary wound up not being moved, with Trump winning Illinois, but the push was strategic as Clinton didn’t poll well against moderate Republicans such as Sen. Marco Rubio and Gov. John Kasich.

In damage control over a false statement Clinton made about Nancy Reagan’s role in the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the Clinton campaign noted in an email chain that they would have to coerce Clinton into admitting she was wrong.

Here is a revised draft of a statement. It does include the words ‘I made a mistake’ in the first line. We need a strategy for getting her to approve this.” WIKILEAKS

And then there’s the overly docile press, who were so eager to help Clinton get elected. In one email chain discussing the upcoming release of exchanges between Clinton and writer Sidney Blumenthal, insiders noted that the Associated Press appeared to be willing to allow the Clinton campaign to plant favorable stories.

They are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it,” wrote Nick Merrill, the Clinton campaign’s traveling press secretary.

“She is going to read me the story later today off the record to further assure me,” Clinton campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in an email to Podesta and other staff about New York Times‘ Maggie Haberman coordinating directly with the campaign to provide Clinton with favorable coverage. WIKILEAKS

On October 11, The Young Turks’ Jordan Chariton first reported another email that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to a question on the death penalty that would be asked at a CNN Town Hall the next day. Brazile was a CNN contributor at the time, and that wasn’t her only helpful tip. “For the debate team,” she wrote in a March email about the Voting Rights Act, forwarded to Podesta.

She is going to read me the story later today off the record to further assure me,” Clinton campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in an email to Podesta and other staff about New York Times‘ Maggie Haberman coordinating directly with the campaign to provide Clinton with favorable coverage. WIKILEAKS

Much of this confirms the suspicions of Trump supporters. The question is, if he loses the election, how and when does it stop? It seems as though if Clinton wins the election are only protection against full blown socialist takeover is Article 5 in the Constitution.


Voter Fraud – The Hypocrisy Of CNN And The MSM

While conservative Trump supporters have reason to be concerned about allegations of widespread voter fraud, it seems as though liberal news outlets like CNN and MSNBC are quick to denounce allegations calling them ridiculous in many cases.

With videos proving that Democrat surrogates are actively involved in widespread cheating why would these news outlets be so quick to discount what is obviously happening?  Their positions add Credence to Donald Trump’s position that the media is placed firmly in the pocket book of the Clinton Camp and the Democrat Party in general.

In a recent article, CNN’s Brian Stelter “connects the dots between voter concerns about election fraud, misleading stories on fringe web sites, and Donald Trump’s warnings about a rigged election.”

First, there’s this bombshell Wikileaks Podesta email. According to Daily Caller:

Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign “flooded” the caucuses with “ineligible voters,” according to leaked emails.


Black Hat Conservative has unearthed a CNN article from October 2008, outlining how Obama and Acorn stole the primaries from Hillary in 2008:

More than 2,000 voter registration forms filed in northern Indiana’s Lake County by a liberal activist group this week have turned out to be bogus, election officials said Thursday.

The group — the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN — already faces allegations of filing fraudulent voter registrations in Nevada and faces investigations in other states.

And in Lake County, home to the long-depressed steel town of Gary, the bipartisan Elections Board has stopped processing a stack of about 5,000 applications delivered just before the October 6 registration deadline after the first 2,100 turned out to be phony.

“All the signatures looked exactly the same,” Ruthann Hoagland, a Republican on the board. “Everything on the card filled out looks exactly the same.”

The forms included registrations submitted in the names of the dead — and in one case, the name of a fast-food restaurant, Jimmy Johns. Sally LaSota, a Democrat on the board, called the forms fraudulent and said whoever filed them broke the law. “ACORN, with its intent, perhaps was good in the beginning, but went awry somewhere,” LaSota said.

Over the past four years, a dozen states have investigated complaints of fraudulent registrations filed by ACORN. On Tuesday, Nevada authorities raided an ACORN office in Las Vegas, Nevada, where workers are accused of registering members of the Dallas Cowboys football team. And the group has become the target of Republican attacks on voter fraud, a perennial GOP issue.

They went on to show how then Candidate Senator Obama paid a subsidiary of Acorn to do what they do:

A subsidiary of the group was paid $800,000 by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama‘s campaign to register voters for the 2008 primaries, and ACORN’s political wing endorsed Obama back in February. But Obama’s campaign told CNN that it “is committed to protecting the integrity of the voting process,” and said it has not worked with ACORN during the general election.

Brian Mellor, an ACORN attorney in Boston, said the group has its own quality-control process and has fired workers in the past — including workers in Gary. But he said allegations that his organization committed fraud is a government attempt to keep people disenfranchised.

So does voter fraud exist or does it not? I can’t help but point out the obvious: Trump is right that the mainstream media are surrogates of the Clinton cartel and the Democrats in general.

Why else would they take such a different stance in 2016? Why would they not refer to pass report to support the idea that it may be happening? Isn’t that what a journalist would do?

Instead it seems that every move the MSM makes is 2 either support Clinton or destroy Trump.  It’s so obvious at this point there just is no denying it.


Hillary Clinton Tpp Gold Standard – YES She Said It And Here’s The Video

One of the hottest debated topics in the last debate was Trump’s position that Hillary, now opposing the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) was once for it calling it “the Gold Standard”. Well, to those of you Clinton apologists who fancy her so principled, her you go:





Why Trump Is Headed For Victory In November – Professor Allan Lichtman

During this unpredictable election cycle, one professor feels the opposite – that it is very predictable indeed. History Professor Allan Lichtman of American University in Washington has accurately predicted the popular result in presidential elections since Republican President Ronald Reagan defeated Democratic challenger Walter Mondale in 1984.

In this video he explains how he successfully predicted the outcomes of the last 8 elections and why he believes that Donald J. Trump will be the next President Of The United States. If he’s wrong, he states that the outcome would “upset the verdict of history”. Have a look: